Volume 3, Issue 4 (2018)                   2018, 3(4): 223-228 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Ayatollah Rafsanjani Complex, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, 2 Kilometer of Airport Road, Urmia, Iran. , m_emami63@yahoo.com
2- Jurisprudence & Law Department, Theology & Islamic Sciences Faculty, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3- Law Department, Humanities Faculty, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran
Abstract:   (4464 Views)
Introduction: According to the criminal laws, abortion is considered as a crime in most cases and in rare cases, it is considered an exception. One of these cases of abortion is based on the Coercion Rule, a jurisprudential principle. The state of coercion for the mother to save her life will authorize abortion. The coercion rule indicates that this is true for abortion, such as the famous hadith, called Raf, which is in the process of removing the sentence from the contributor in special circumstances. Hence, the aim of this study was to analyze the coercion rule in abortion permission. This research is applied in terms of the aim that was conducted by content analysis method. In the organization of research, the documentary and library methods have been used and the analysis of the information was qualitatively performed based on the inference of the researcher from the Quranic sources and jurisprudential and legal texts; so, the information were collected through library and document measurement tools.
Conclusion: In case of emergency, Iranian law permits abortion before the age of 4 months.
 
Full-Text [PDF 439 kb]   (1035 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/09/17 | Accepted: 2018/11/8 | Published: 2018/12/20

References
1. Kerameti Moez H, Chavooshi MS, Abdollahi S. Jurisprudential foundations of abortion permission; with emphasis on jurisprudential rule of incompatibility. J Quran Med. 2018;3(2):73-9. [Persian] [Link]
2. Mohaqeq Damad SM. The Rules of Islamic Jurisprudence. 33rd Edition. Tehran: Islamic Science Publishing Center; 2016. p. 123-38 [Persian] [Link]
3. Abdollahi Alibeyk H. The Rule of Emergency. J Islamic Stud. 2004;(63):83-124. [Persian] [Link]
4. Habibzadeh MJ. Urgency (necessity). Leg J Justice. 1996;5(15-16):55-86. [Persian] [Link]
5. Vatani A. Jurisprudential review of urgency and necessity. J Artic Surv. 2002;71:187-207. [Persian] [Link]
6. Jafarpour J, Hosseinizadeh L. Examination of emergency in Iran's criminal law according to Imam Khomeini's viewpoint. Matin. 2006;8(33):41-62. [Persian] [Link]
7. Ardebili MA. Droit penal general. Volume 1. 32nd Edition. Tehran: Mizan; 2013. p. 249 [Persian] [Link]
8. Fallahnejad F. A comparative study of abortion in Iranian and Russian penal law. J Womens Stud. 2013;4(8):85-114. [Persian] [Link]
9. Mehrpour H. Collection of Guardian Council's views. Volume 2. 1st Edition. Tehran: Dadgostar; 2009. p. 170 [Persian] [Link]
10. Salarzaei AH. Davoodi M. Jurisprudential and legal survey of abortion. Q Jurisprud Hist Civiliz. 2007;4(13):44-72. [Persian] [Link]
11. Kharrazi SM. Limiting generation and sterilization. J Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprud. 1999;4(14):101-24. [Arabic] [Link]
12. Rouhani Aliabadi M, Noghani F. Medical jurisprudence. 1st Edition. Tehran: Taimorzadeh; 1999. pp. 95-6 [Persian] [Link]
13. Hajiali F. Abortion; unlawful or allowable. J Artic Surv. 2004;37(4):55-81. [Persian] [Link]
14. Alimohammadzadeh Kh. Medicine at the Mirror of Ijtehad. 1st Edition. Qom: Marbur Cultural Service Company; 1996. p. 154 [Persian] [Link]
15. Rashedi L, Rashedi S. Handbook of explaining the issues. 9th Edition. Tehran: Payam-e-Edalat; 2011. p. 729 [Persian] [Link]
16. Fatahi Masoom SH. Proceedings and speeches of the 2nd seminar on Islamic views in medicine. 1St Edition. Mashhad: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; 2001. Pp. 45-6 [Persian] [Link]
17. Tabibi Jebeli M. A review of the criticism and theory of abortion permission from the viewpoint of Imamiyah jurisprudents. Q Mofid Lett. 2003;37:1-14. [Persian] [Link]
18. Nozari Ferdowsi M. Abortion in Islamic law and feminism. Womens Strateg Stud. 2005;7(28):44-82. [Persian] [Link]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.