Qur̓ān va ṭib
(Quran and Medicine)
Volume 3, Issue 2 (2018)
2018, 3(2): 81-87 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sanjabi N, ShekrBeigi A, Hariri M. Interaction of the Principles of Jurisprudence and Ethics in the Organ Transplantation. Quran and Medicine 2018; 3 (2) :81-87
URL: http://quranmed.com/article-1-186-en.html
URL: http://quranmed.com/article-1-186-en.html
1- Theology Department, Theology Faculty, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran , n_sanjabi@pnu.ac.ir
2- Low Department, Theology Faculty, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2- Low Department, Theology Faculty, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (7390 Views)
Introduction: Today, the development of medical knowledge has caused issues such as organ transplantation in the field of Islamic studies. Therefore, it is important to examine such issues because of the explanation of its moral and legal legitimacy. Although several opinions have been presented by various scholars in this field, different aspects of the issue and its specific complexities have contradicted their views on this issue. Juridical and ethical foundations and the confrontation of these foundations have led to the emergence of different and sometimes contradictory principles in this field. According to some principles, including monarchy and types of property, the jurists gave permission to transplant organs. On the other hand, ethics scholars also seek to deny the possession of human beings in their organs, using principles such as trust and absolute authority of God. The aim of the present study was to examine the interaction of the principles of jurisprudence and ethics in the organ transplantation.
Conclusion: Organ transplantation is a product of new science and it has good results for human life. Any delimitation to actions such as the organ transplantation by Islamic jurisprudence or other divine religions is based on the preservation of human moral rights. There is a difference between the jurists and the religious scholars in recognizing that whether organ transplantation undermine the rights of individuals, but the existence of delimitation is essential for the continuity of ethical life. In general, the use of organ transplantation is legitimate and permissible according to the principle of expediency and necessity, as well as principles such as monarchy and trust.
Conclusion: Organ transplantation is a product of new science and it has good results for human life. Any delimitation to actions such as the organ transplantation by Islamic jurisprudence or other divine religions is based on the preservation of human moral rights. There is a difference between the jurists and the religious scholars in recognizing that whether organ transplantation undermine the rights of individuals, but the existence of delimitation is essential for the continuity of ethical life. In general, the use of organ transplantation is legitimate and permissible according to the principle of expediency and necessity, as well as principles such as monarchy and trust.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2018/05/13 | Accepted: 2018/05/14 | Published: 2018/06/20
Received: 2018/05/13 | Accepted: 2018/05/14 | Published: 2018/06/20
References
1. Ardeshir Larijani B. Physician and ethical considerations: A review of the foundations of medical ethics. Volum 1. Tehran: Barayefarda; 2004. p. 44. [Persian] [Link]
2. Noorizade E, Mirzapour T, Nik Sirat M. Obstacles and strategies for the development and transplantation of organs in Iran. In: Sanati MH, editor. Proceedings of the international congress of bioethics. Tehran: Bitarafan; 2005. [Persian] [Link]
3. Johari E. Beirut's Peace Corps and Sahaah al-Arabiya (Al-Sahah Fel-Loghat). Volume 6. Beirut:Dar al-Elm. 1996. p. 2234. [Arabic] [Link]
4. Altahanooi M. Encyclopedia of arts and sciences (Mosoaa Keshaf Estelahat Al-Fonon Va Al-Oloom). Beirut: Maktabata Lobnan Nasheron; 1996. p. 4783. [Arabic] [Link]
5. Ameli Jeb'e AIA. Knowledge of religion and the sanctuary of the diligents (Ma'alem al-Din and Mullaz al-Majtahdin). Volume 1. Qom: Al-Fiqh leltabaa and al-Nashar Institute; 1997. P. 90. [Arabic] [Link]
6. Rajaei F, Mohaghegh Damad, SM. Legal and jurisprudential consideration of human organ's value. J Med Jurisprud. 2016;8(26), pp.137-173. [Persian] [Link]
7. Ibn manzoor MIM. Arabic language (Lisan al-Arab). Volume 13. Beirut: Dar al-Beirut; 1984. p. 543. [Arabic] [Link]
8. Majlesi MB. Seas of Lights (Bihar al-Anwar). Volume 59. Tehran: Islamiyah; 2013. p. 15. [Link]
9. Al-Zobaidi MM. Crown of the bride jewels dictionary (Taj Al-Arus Min Jawahir Al-Qamus). Volume 6. Beirut: Dar Al-Hedaye; 1965. p. 337. [Arabic] [Link]
10. Motahari M. General sciences of Islam .1th Edition. Tehran: Sadra; 1997. p. 22. [Persian] [Link]
11. Momen Qomi M. The words of Sadidat in new matters (Kalamete sadidat fi masaele jadidat). Volume 1. Qom: Al-Nashre al-Islami Institute; 1994. pp. 171-291. [Link]
12. Kashif al-Ghiṭa A. The benefits of jaafari (Favayed-O-Al-jafavarieye). Qom: Kāshif al-Ghaṭa; year Unknown. p. 186. [Arabic] [Link]
13. Ibn Fares A. Dictionary of language standards (Majma maghaiis al-loghat). Volume 3. Abd al-Salam Mohammad H, editor. Qom: Al-Nashr center; 1983. p. 95. [Arabic] [Link]
14. Irvani B. Preliminary lessons in jurisprudential rules (Doroose tamhidie fi al-qava'ed al-feqhie). Volume 2. Qom: Dar al-Fiqh Leltaba'at wa al-Nashr; 1996. p. 107. [Arabic] [Link]
15. Al-Montazeri HA. Studies in the state of jurisprudence and Islamic jurisprudence (Derasat fi valayat al-faqih wa fiqhe al-daulat al-Islamiya). Volume 1. Qom: Tafakor; 1988. p. 495. [Persian] [Link]
16. Al-Mousavi al-Khoee SA. Principles Lamp (Mesbah al-osul). Volume 6. Va'ez al-Hoseyni MS, editor. Qom: Maktabat al-Davari; 2001. p. 318. [Arabic] [Link]
17. Mostafavi K. Lesson outside jurisprudence [Internet]. Tehran: Fiqahat School; 2011 [cited 2017 October 13]. Available from: http://www.eshia.ir/Feqh/Archive/text/mostafavi/feqh/89/900301. [Persian] [Link]
18. Shayegh M. The study of the rule of the monarchy and its flow in the reign of the soul and organs. Res jurisprud. 2015;4(8):5-26.[Persian] [Link]
19. Moosavi Bojnordi SM. Rules of jurisprudence. Volume 2. Thran: MAJD; 2017. p. 197. [Persian] [Link]
20. Mohaghegh Damad SM. The rules of Islamic jurisprudence. Volume 2. 2th Edition. Center for prmotion of Islamic studies; 2002. p. 135. [Persian] [Link]
21. Akhoond khorasani MKIH. Sufficiency of principles (Kefayah al-osul). Volume 2. Qom: Moaseseye Nashre Islami; 1993. p. 390-1. [persian] [Link]
22. Gharavi Naeeni MH. Asset Benefits (Fava'ed al-osul). Kazemi Khorasani MA, Eraqi QD, editors. Qom: Islamic publishing Institute; 1937. p. 192. [Arabic] [Link]
23. Al-Kulayni MIY. The Sufficient Book (Kitab al-Kafi). Volume 7. Al-Qafari AA, editor. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-Islami; 1987. p. 63. [Arabic] [Link]
24. Esmaeili E. Transplants, buying and selling of body organ. New Explor Fiqh. 1994;1(1):201-14. [Persian] [Link]
25. Mohaghegh damad SM. The rules of jurisprudence. Volume 2. 12th Edition. Tehran: Center for prmotion of Islamic studies; 1986. p. 89. [Persian] [Link]
26. Al-Mosavi al-Khoei SA. Lamp assets (Mesbah al-osul). Volume 2. Al-Va'ez al-Hoseini MS, Al-Qayomi al-Esfahani J, editors. Qom: Maktabat al-Davari; 2001. p. 39. [Persian] [Link]
27. Mohseni MA. Jurisprudence and medical issues (Al-Fiqh wa masa'el tabieh). Qom: Islamic Propagation Center of Howzah; 2003. p. 185. [Arabic] [Link]
28. Ghorban Nia N. Rights, translator of ethics. Naqad Va Nazar. 1998;4(1-2):384-408. [Persian] [Link]
29. Larijani B. Organ transplanation: Medical, ethical and juridical. Tehran: Barayefarda; 2003. p. 44. [Persian] [Link]
30. Aladvi A. The madness of science in the cultivation of organs, science without religion ends in disaster. Menbar al-Islam. 1991;51(2):30-4. [Arabic] [Link]
31. Naraghi MIA, Almozafar, GMR, Kalantar, AA. Comprehensive al-Sa'adat (Jama' alsa'adat). Volume 1. 3th Edition. Founder Aloalm Publications; 2000. p. 136. [Arabic] [Link]
32. Abbasi M. Medical rights: Organ transplantation. Tehran: Sina Cultural-Legal Institute: Legal Publishing; 2009. p. 135. [Persian]. [Link]
33. Frankena WK. Ethics Philosophy. Sadeghi H, translator. Qom: Taha book; 1997. p. 187. [Persian] [Link]
34. Motahhari Pour M, Azarbaijani M. Ethical caution in organ transplants. Pazhuohesh Nameh-e Akhlagh. 2013;6(19):119-36. [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |